Free planning tool
Antenna Height Planner
How high the gateway and the device need to be, and which of the two is really costing you range.
1 · The link
Height is the one lever that moves range. Transmit power barely touches it.
Gateway 30 m · device 2 m
1.82km
To reach your target
Radio horizon at these heights is 28.4 km, and our measured field ceiling is 3.49 km. Whichever is smallest wins.
Raise the device
Gateway stays at its current height.
about 588 m of extra reach per metre
Metre for metre, raising the device wins here — about 20.6× more range per metre than raising the mast. A sensor near the ground is what pinches the Fresnel zone, and the tightest point on the path sits next to it, not in the middle. Getting a sensor off the floor and onto a pole is usually cheaper than a taller tower, too. Path loss stops improving above 10 m because that is where the underlying model was fitted; a device higher than that will do at least this well, and the Fresnel figures above keep improving.
48%
Fresnel zone clear at 3.00 km
1.91km
Clear path holds to
28.4km
Radio horizon
The path in profile
Over 3.00 km. The shaded ellipse is the space the radio needs kept clear.
The ground eats into the Fresnel zone 2.8 km along, leaving 48% of the 8 m it needs. Past about 1.91 km this link is diffracting over the earth rather than propagating freely — which is exactly the loss our field calibration accounts for.
Raise the gateway
Device stays at its current height.
about 29 m of extra reach per metre of mast
How these numbers are calculated
Fresnel zone — a radio path needs an ellipsoid of clear space around the sight line, not just an unobstructed straight line. Its radius at any point is 17.32·√(d₁·d₂/(f·d)) metres. Keep 60% of it clear and the link behaves close to free space; lose more and diffraction loss climbs quickly.
Earth bulge — the ground rises d₁·d₂/(12.75·k) metres above the chord, with k = 4/3 for standard atmospheric refraction. Over a few kilometres that is small; what matters far more is that a low antenna starts with almost no clearance to give away.
The tightest point is scanned, not assumed — with unequal antenna heights the worst clearance is near the lower end, not mid-path. Checking mid-path alone flatters the answer badly: for a 30 m gateway to a 2 m sensor over 8 km it reports 57% clearance where the true minimum along the path is 28%.
Range — the same field-calibrated model as the coverage calculator, capped by the radio horizon 4.12·(√h₁+√h₂) and by the furthest we have measured this class of link.
Device height is capped at 10 m — Okumura-Hata's mobile-antenna correction is linear in height and only fitted over 1–10 m. Extrapolated to a sensor on a 20 m pole it hands out roughly 45 dB of free gain, which reads as a twentyfold range increase and is pure artefact. Above 10 m the range figure holds flat; treat it as a floor, not a ceiling.
Smooth-earth geometry. Real terrain, buildings and trees will be worse — confirm with a site survey before committing to a mast.
Let‘s make it easy - reach out now!
Let’s bring it to life!
Let‘s Make it Easy
Reach Out Now
We are always ready
to help and
answer your
questions
Call
+91 7972856163
+91 9096830856
Location
Office-15 Bibwewadi, Pune, Maharashtra 411037
Get in Touch
Define your goals and all to value your time
Use of this website and purchase of Macnman products are subject to our Terms and Conditions.